Genre Archive

0

The Daily Shaft: Terra Nova is Dead

Terra Nova: An original concept if you never watched Land of the Lost

Fox’s Dinosaur Time Travel Family Adventure Hour, also known as Terra Nova is cancelled. Yay! Though as an animal lover, I suppose I should be a little upset. After all, what are all those domestic house cats that the series employed as writers going to do for their milk money? With Terra Nova going and Community coming back, March is shaping up to be a shiny month.

As one would expect, the internet’s reactions to Terra Nova’s cancellation has been mixed. One outraged fan took to twitter, calling the show “…science fiction’s canary in a coal mine.”

I don’t see what is generating all this pessimism. Televised space opera/science fiction has always been an expensive investment, perhaps more so during the golden age of the mid-90s to the mid 2000s than today. While Terra Nova was 2011′s most expensive show on television this year, I’ll eat my hat if its special effects cost more per capita than they did for something like Babylon 5 – a series that had to contend with computer graphics when they were still in their infancy.

Let us instead account for the current glut in quality science fiction as an experiment in supply and demand. When the supply of any given commodity drops, in this case strong genre programming, the demand increases. This timeline for demand, however, does not necessarily follow the same path as the drop in supply. The market, as represented by the world’s sci-fi junkies, needs to reach a critical mass in demand before supply will start to increase. To put it another way, we need to miss the hell out of sci-fi before it will come back. We need to get emo about this in a way that makes Jared Leto look well adjusted.

““But what about the money,” somebody cries from the peanut gallery. “Networks only want to make money, and they can do that producing crap reality television which brings in cash by the truckload.”

Certainly that’s a fair point. To counter that I would draw upon Alyssa Rosenberg’s Terra Nova piece over at Think Progress. Therein, Rosenberg illustrates numerous examples of SF movies and television series that have drawn on visual aesthetics, language, and manners to cheaply create an appropriate distance between the story telling and the reality of our world.

I would also add the BBC’s Blake’s 7 to her list of televised sci-fi that worked without a giant budget. B7’s special effects budget stood at about 100£ per episode during its 52 episode run from 1978-1981. How then did it pull off a space opera about a group of rebels attempting to bring down the despotic Terran Federation? From the outset it was literary. The Federation didn’t need fancy looking starships beyond their barely animated canopy drawings a la Monty Python when its Orwellian conceit and jack booted soldiers solid the concept of what the Federation stood for. All series creator Terry Nation had to do then was round up a bunch of unemployed classically trained actors, plop them into the middle of his world, and watch them chew on the scenery.

Writing and acting, sometimes that is all a good series needs to survive. If Terra Nova had either of those things, then I would be lamenting its loss. Granted, the series had the highest ratings of anything in 2011’s cancellation pile; Terra Nova also received some of the worst critical reviews of 2011. I know it is hard to see a sci-fi series go, but to allege that this is the end of televised genre fiction is to drastically oversell the importance of Steven Spielberg’s first among losers dino drama.


0

Podcast #17: The Airing of Grievances


Featuring Adam Shaftoe talking to himself sans guest.

Topics under discussion include: Genre things that pissed Adam off in 2011.  As well, some important thoughts on the Stop Online Piracy Act.  Also, my thanks to my various guests who came on the podcast during the year.

NB: Matt Moore’s thoughts on the first half of The Walking Dead season 2 can be found at here.

Right click “download” and “save link as” if you are having trouble downloading.


3

The Genre Wars: Are They Over?

In August, AE: The Canadian Science Fiction review published my short story Ascension, which is about the zombie apocalypse told from a zombie’s point of view. Some would say this alone makes it a horror story. Yet it also deals with mass consciousness and the transcendence of the physical to the purely mental―the zombie apocalypse as the singularity―topics normally found in science fiction.

So, is it then a sci-fi story?

My question is: does it even matter? And are these divisions hurting us as a community?

In genre fiction, we tend to separate down (sometimes rigid) genre lines: she loves fantasy, he only reads sci-fi, she digs horror. These divisions and identities sometimes border on the obsessive. I’ve seen a discussion become an argument that almost came to blows over whether Star Wars is science fiction or fantasy. Star Wars cos players dissing steampunkers.  Science fiction nerds dismissing the entire horror genre because it doesn’t deal with “big ideas.”

I can’t help but wonder if our rivals in literature segment themselves so fiercely. Has anyone almost had a fist fight over whether The Handmaid’s Tale is more CanLit or FemLit? I doubt it.

But back to us. Are we doing ourselves a disservice by trying to define and segment genres? Could this infighting contribute to the image the literary set has of genre as childish stories for childish people, neither of which can be taken seriously? As a community, can we set aside the idea of “genre” and judge and evaluate stories on their own merits?

Looking at the state of genre fiction, we find more and more stories crossing genres or that are difficult to classify. Peter Watts’ The Things is up for the Hugo, a science fiction award, even though the story’s beats and tone read as horror (similar to the source material―John Carpenter’s The Thing and the short story “Who Goes There?”). Over on AE, which is running some great mixed genre stories that anyone can read for free, the second story of its inaugural issue was my Touch the Sky, They Say (which is, ahem, up for an Aurora Award). Set in a world where the sky has literally fallen, transforming the Earth into a grey, passion-less place, it’s not quite science fiction and not quite fantasy. Silvia Moreno-Garcia’s The Death Collector has horror elements but a sci-fi vibe. And how do you classify Don’t Move a Muscle, Mr. Liberty by Jordan Ellinger?

Not only do they defy easy genre classification, in all of these works literary qualities—character, pacing, settings, theme―are taken seriously.

Have we finally returned to a point where stories are just stories? No one labeled Shelley, Verne or Wells as “genre writers.” (Although the term “scientific romances” was used.) And witness The Time Traveler’s Wife or Oryx and Crake being shelved in mainstream literature. And let’s understand that the idea of genres was started by book stores so the pulp adventure stories of Howard’s Cimmerian or Heinlein’s spaceships wouldn’t be shelved with serious literature.

Granted, there are those who not only vigorously defend the need for the genre/literature distinction (on both sides of the writing world), but also the dividing lines of the big three (horror, science fiction and fantasy; granted, there is also romance, westerns and crime).

Horror, some say, is a personal and moral genre. Horror stories push us into a state of disquiet and dread, begging examination to determine why we are horrified.

Fantasy, on the other hand, offers escapism with places and creatures far-removed from our humdrum lives.

Meanwhile, science fiction posits how a new technology―be it digital, physical or even supernatural―affects the human condition, and by doing so shows something about our world.

While these distinctions make analysis and discussion of works interesting, authors are not remaining trapped within their confines, nor are magazines and anthologies. Here in Canada, we see On Spec, Neo-oposis, Tesseracts, ChiZine, Ideomancer and, of course, AE more interested in tone and theme (and quality) than narrow definitions of what is and is not science fiction or fantasy. (Apologies to any Canadian markets I missed.) This editorial leaning will force writers to focus on characterization, mood and theme rather than just a cool idea about robots or graphic descriptions of blood letting.

Still, this does not mean genre fiction will lose its genre edge. We need robots and blood letting. Ascension has a line about a zombie feasting on loops of guts it pulls out of someone’s abdomen, and the story would be the worse without it. So genre fans rejoice―what makes science fiction great will continue to be there. But the bar is being raised and the quality of work is improving.

And hopefully, we can stop sniping at each other behind our backs.