The Hunger Games Archive

0

The Tripods Trilogy: How Well Has it Aged?

One of the best teachers I ever had introduced me and my eighth grade classmates to the BBC’s TV adaptation of John Christopher’s (aka Samuel Youd) The Tripods Trilogy. It was 1994. I was thirteen years old, the same age as series protagonist Will Parker, and for thirty minutes every other Friday afternoon I was in hog heaven. I didn’t actually read the trilogy until I was in the first year of university. Alas as a young adult I was loath to read anything so labeled.

More recently I impulse bought myself an e-book edition of the trilogy. Out of sheer curiosity I read the forward wherein the editor, or associate publisher, or somebody with a title, claimed that “despite a revival in the 80s, Christopher’s work has fallen out of favour over recent years.”

Fallen out of favour? When did the world of post-apocalyptic YA fiction turn into the Roman Senate? As a cultural icon, I doubt The Tripods Trilogy is able to boast the same sort of success as The Hunger Games. But to accuse something of falling out of favour implies an inherent weakness within the text, something I had no memory of from my initial read through. After re-reading the trilogy I find little that would fit the bill of a novel that has “fallen out of favour”. In fairness, it does have a few problems that would probably preclude a resurgence to the top of the best seller list. Yet as a story that was written prior to the Apollo moon landing, The White Mountains, The City of Lead and Gold, and The Pool of Fire hold up surprisingly well.

Weaknesses

A Particular Eurocentrism

The story of The Tripods Trilogy is the story of two English boys’ journey into manhood set against freeing the world, as represented by Western Europe, from alien invaders known to most humans as the tripods. North America, Asia, and Africa are mentioned within the three books, but the primary characters are all identified as either English, German, or French. Point in fact, I don’t think there’s a single non-white speaking character in the series.

Rubbish Female Characters

The three books that encompass the original Tripods trilogy are stories about boys, for boys. The only female character of any substance within the story appears in the first novel as Will’s love interest. Though unlike Will, who resists “capping”, the process through which the tripods remove all curiosity, rebellion, and creativity from humanity by means of a cybernetic skull cap, Elosie welcomes the experience. For her thoughtless devotion to the tripods, her utter inability to logic or reason, she is rewarded with death and embalming within the Masters’, the aliens who control the tripods, gallery of beauty.

Even the scant colony of “Free Men” within the French Alps is a boys only environment. Though the Free Men send out scouts to recruit rebellious lads before they are capped on their fourteenth birthday, the thought never occurs to this resistance group that females might be useful to the cause.

Strengths

Plausible Science and Alien Aliens

When Will infiltrates one of the three cities that the Masters use to control the Earth, he is confronted with an environment that is utterly alien to him. In his capacity as a personal slave to a Master, Will struggles against unnatural heat and humidity, increased gravity that kills most slaves within five years, a toxic atmosphere, and bizarre architecture. In their own right, the Masters are more alien than most Star Trek aliens. Christopher did a brilliant job creating an antagonist that is utterly incompatible with terrestrial life in both biology and culture.

Moral Ambiguity

After losing Eloise to the tripods, Will never doubts the righteousness of his quest to free the Earth from the Masters. That steadfast belief in the cause, however, allows readers to see some of the realities of Will’s world. At age thirteen, Will was recruited to leave home and join with a bunch of rebels living in the mountains. There he and other boys his age were trained to infiltrate the Masters’ cities and conduct covert reconnaissance. Once that was done Will and his friends set about creating resistance cells across the world as part of a plan to decentralize and expand the resistance. Will Parker might be a hero, but he is also a fully mobilized child soldier. While the older free men plan, it is the boys who go out into the world and actively oppose the Masters. Say what you will about teenage death matches, but I think John Christopher has Suzanne Collins beat when it comes to making teens do questionable things.

A Flawed Protagonist

Will is often described as being too small for his size and prone to fits of impulsive behavior. Indeed, his lack of forethought is a consist theme throughout the trilogy. One such occurrence results in Will having to kill someone in cold blood to maintain his cover as a “capped” servant of the tripods. The aftermath of that kill very nearly results in the death of a friend. Even when the stakes are lower, Will’s inability to keep calm and think often leads to missions going astray. Although events generally work out well for Will, he’s not the sort of flawless character that one might expect from mid-century YA.

An Interesting Relationship with Religion

The Masters’ greatest strength is their ability to manipulate the human mind. In England and France the tripods are venerated and honoured. When Will travels East into what is presumably modern Turkey, he’s confronted with a tripod cult where all adherents “pause three times a day to pray to the glory tripods.” Perhaps this isn’t a strength, per se, so much as another indication of the novel’s Eurocentric tendencies. However, it is interesting to see one of the best ways humanity has for controlling itself supplanted by an alien other.

Accessible Language

As texts get older, so too do they grow apart from English as it is spoken today. When I compared 1000 words from The Hunger Games to a 1000 words from The White Mountains both had comparable Flesch-Kincaid grade levels: 7.5 for The White Mountains and 6.0 for The Hunger Games. Leaving the statistics aside though, there’s little within the mechanics and style of The White Mountains, or any other books in the Tripods Trology, that would confound a modern reader. Though set at the dawn of the 22nd century, the level of technology within the story, save for the triopds and the Masters’ city, is mostly medieval. That said there’s almost a fantasy element to the story which lends itself to creating a world that is set apart from linear time. As a text anchored in history but driven by science fiction, there’s little in the way of a cultural gap that makes the novels feel like something that is feeling its age.

The Bottom Line

There are some aspects of The Tripods Trilogy that are very telling about the point in which the story was written. There’s no room for women in what is largely a male dominated world. Islam is arguably reduced to an outgrowth of the alien “other”, where people in Christian dominated Western Europe are seen to be less oddly devoted in their beliefs. Yet as an alien invasion story, the writing makes the reader complicit in embracing Will’s transformation into a soldier. To reject this change, and the resistance of the Free Men, is to embrace the Masters’ plan for human subjugation and extermination. In that sense, The Tripods Trilogy is wholly clever and still very much in tune with modern YA lit and contemporary issues.


2

The Daily Shaft: Karl Schroeder and Non-Violent Resistance in The Hunger Games

Weeks ago I was wasting time on twitter when Canada’s own Karl Schroeder began a series of tweets about non-violent resistance and Suzanne Collins’ YA novel The Hunger Games. I’ve reproduced his ideas below so that we can all get on the same page.

“Hunger Games: good movie, but suffers the same flaw as the book: it does not present nonviolent resistance as a valid moral option”

“No character chooses to deliberately demonstrate a willingness to be killed rather than kill–not even Peeta”

“This removes an entire moral stance from the table, making The Hunger Games’s conversation about moral choices incomplete”

“Note especially that the value of nonviolent resistance cannot be judged by its immediate effectiveness, i.e. as a means of ‘winning’”

“Imagine Hunger Games with a tribute character who yells “I will not play your game” and then jumps off a cliff. That’s what’s missing”

“The reason it’s missing is that such an act would undermine every other moral choice in the story–actually raise uncomfortable questions”

Though I’ve yet to see The Hunger Games screen adaptation, I was captivated by Schroeder’s ideas. At no point during my own critical interaction with the text did I ever stop to think about non-violent resistance on the part of the tributes or the people of Panem’s districts. For the sake of this post, I thought I would work through the first question that I came up with upon thinking about Mr. Schroeder’s words.

What would happen if a tribute said no?

Let us assume that our would-be tribute has found the remains of some pre-cataclysm library, and is therefore intellectually and spiritually prepared to reject any role in the institution of the Hunger Games. When Reaping day comes, their name gets called. Yet our tribute is nowhere to be found. As a show of protest they decide to sleep through Reaping day.

I imagine the state’s response would be two-fold. First the Peacekeepers would track down the offending tribute. Then I expect the Capitol’s representative would begin a systematic shaming against the family of our tribute; after all it is an honour to be selected for the Games. Assuming the limited free-market economy that exists within district twelve, as seen in the novel, is endemic of all of Panem, exclusion from society could be a powerful weapon of social control. However, shame is a tricky thing. It assumes that the people instigating the shame can appeal to shared values with those evoking the shame.

Despite the fact that some critics like to draw comparisons between Collins and Orwell, Panem is not Oceania. It’s not even Rome. The people who live in the districts are not subject to systematic thought control/modification. The Capitol primarily holds its power through the apathy of the districts and its military might. In fact, if we trust Rue’s description of district eleven and Katniss’ vision of district twelve as accurate, then the vast majority of the people who live in Panem’s districts actively dislike the Capitol and President Snow, including the Peacekeepers who deal in Katniss’ black market goods. Ergo, attempts at state sanctioned shaming might have the opposite effect whereby they generate a sense of community within a district.

Things get less optimistic once the tribute is relocated to the Capitol. At that point non-violent resistance must take one of two forms, suicide or willing slaughter in the arena. An interesting question then emerges: is it still an act of non-violent resistance if a tribute steals a knife from the dining room of their quarters and cuts open their wrists in the bathroom? If death is inevitable, how much value do we put on the agency of that death? Is a conscious decision to self-terminate equal to allowing oneself to be killed?

If the Medium is the Message, make sure to control the Medium.

Remember that those in power within the Capitol are experts at manipulating the media. The message of non-violent resistance, the essential refusal to be a party to blood sports and its associated social structures, would never make it out into the districts. Be it a bedroom suicide or a tribute stepping into the active mines surrounding their entry point into the arena, the facts would get edited, spun, and managed into oblivion. This begs the question, if there’s no audience for non-violent resistance, does it still have a purpose?

From a critical and moral point of view, I can completely see what Schroeder means about not letting the discussion happen within the book. Yet questions of non-violent resistance within the world of The Hunger Games would likely turn into a discussion that rationalizes suicide. Personally, I think that would be interesting. But I wonder how many publishers would want to add that particular layer to a book that already pushes boundaries of acceptable taste in framing state sanctioned teenage death matches within the lens of faux-Orwellian dystopia.

To put it another way: how would the public respond to a young adult novel that legitimized suicide as a form of political dissidence? If you thought the Harry Potter controversies were bad, imagine Collins’ novel being framed within the context of self-immolating Buddhist monks.


0

Podcast Episode 19: The One Where We Tried It Live On Google+

Well, almost live...

Featuring the voices of Adam Shaftoe, Beverly Bambury and James Bambury

NB: This podcast represents my attempt to do two new things at the same time. 1) Use a Google+ hangout to record a podcast. 2) Make it an open mic and live-ish affair. On the second point, it was a smashing success. Beverly, James, and I had a great conversation. On the first point, there were some unforeseen technical “hiccups”.

Regrettably, my intended plan to post this podcast in its unabridged and unedited format proved impossible. Moreover, I’m still not really happy with the overall audio fidelity that Google+ offered. As such, the technical elements of this podcast don’t quite measure up to the quality of its content. Prepare for odd noises and warbles that were just impossible to edit out. I apologize in advance. I promise things will be back to normal with my next ‘cast.

Podcast Breakdown

Start to 5:00 – My introduction.

5:00 to 13:00 – Beverly and James arrive – we talk Jesse Griffith’s Cockpit, Aaron Sims’ Archetype, and the nature of proof of concept films.

13:00 to 19:00 – Crowdsourcing creative projects.

19:00 to 26:00 – John Carter (of Mars) and the curse of the Martian movie.

26:oo to 46:00 – The Hunger Games, Rollerball, bloodsports, and cultural appetites therein.

46:00 to 48:00 – Wrap up.

Correction: At 24:45 I meant to say “The Washington Post” not “The Wall Street Journal”

Right click “Download” and click “Save link as” to download a DRM free copy of the cast. We don’t like DRM around these parts.